IFDS Participant Testimonial: London
Discussions with London Arts Council representatives, the artistic
director of the fringe Bush Theatre, and the head of Methuen Publishing
House provided both an overview as well as lots of details about the
United Kingdom's theatrical culture.
Debits, Credits, and Souvenirs: Council's 1997 London Seminar
I settled into my seat on the Air Canada 747 that would carry me
home after my week in London participating in the Council seminar, "Theater
and the Arts in London," hosted by Westminster University. Unencumbered
now by the busy seminar schedule, I had my first chance to take stock
of the whole, intensive experience.
The packed schedule took us into the heart of London's theater world – to
Inigo Jones' 1623 Banqueting Hall, the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts,
the Covent Garden Theatre Museum, the newly reconstructed Globe Theatre,
and to the theaters, from fringe to the West End. Seeing six plays
in five days allowed us to sample the variety of London theater scattered
across the city's landscape, and put endurance and critical attention
to the test. On the debit-side, I was certainly tired from the week's
events, but my mental ledger's credit column overwhelmed mere fatigue.
Seminars led by Alan Morrison (the seminar's faculty leader) and
other University of Westminster faculty provided a tremendous amount
of information on the social, cultural, and economic dimensions of
London theater that will be useful in my drama courses. Contextualizing
dramatic scripts has been a pursuit in my courses over the last several
years as I try to enrich my textual approach. This seminar provided
me with information and approaches that will help me develop a richer
social context, as well as a comparative perspectives, when I discuss
American theater.
In addition, the development of plays and playwrights in Britain
gives me a useful angle to play off in discussing the American theater
scene. Discussions with London Arts Council representatives, the artistic
director of the fringe Bush Theatre, and the head of Methuen Publishing
House provided both an overview as well as lots of details about the
United Kingdom's theatrical culture.
As my flight climbed over the Atlantic, I found myself switching
metaphors from ledger to souvenir album: the group sprawled on the
floor of Whitehall's Banqueting House, relaxing and gazing up at Reuben's
ceiling, a panegyric to the House of Stuart; straphanging on the humid,
crowded tube, talking over the production we were going to see; animated
faces lining the long tables as we dined; the indefatigable Alan Morrison
talking with energy and erudition to whomever might be listening about
photography or architecture or Hogarth; the sumptuously decorated
stage of the new Globe, gazing as much into an imagined past as at
the red, blue, and gold stage in front of me. These London "snapshots" stand
out, as well as memories of pleasant, vigorous, and critically valuable
talks with other faculty participants over breakfast and dinner, or
late at night over a pint of bitter.
As the jetliner landed in Montreal, officially ending my seminar
experience, somehow I felt less fatigued than when I left Heathrow.
The seminar had gone a long way toward "faculty development," I
felt, both professionally and personally. As I drove home from the
airport, I was already framing the review of Marat/Sade that I would
submit to my editor and thinking about the possible spring theater
trip for Clarkson's undergraduates that I began planning with Council
London representatives. I was thinking, too, of what I might say in
this brief piece to encourage others to take advantage of next year's
Council seminar to London.
The above is an account by Owen E. Brady, Associate Professor of
Humanities at Clarkson University. Dr. Brady participated in Council's
IFDS program to London in June 1997.